Published in

American Psychological Association, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(40), p. 1741-1747

DOI: 10.1037/a0037627

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Are Task Irrelevant Faces Unintentionally Processed? Implicit Learning as a Test Case

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Faces are one of the most important signals for reading people’s mental states. In sync with their apparent ‘chronic’ (cross-situational) relevance, faces have been argued to be processed independently of the task one is currently performing. Many of these demonstrations have involved ‘capture of attention’ or increased interference by faces functioning as distractors. Here we ask whether multiple repetitions of task irrelevant faces leave a trace in the system. Specifically, we tested whether repeating structures instantiated by task irrelevant faces are unintentionally or implicitly learned. Our findings indicate that although faces are indeed unique in that they are the only stimulus found to lead to implicit learning of complex rules when irrelevant, such learning is small in magnitude. While these results support the conjecture that task irrelevant faces are processed, the functional significance of this learning needs to be assessed.