Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 6(22), p. S39, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.108

Elsevier, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 1(23), p. 136-137, 2016

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.005

Elsevier, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 5(22), p. 841-845

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Hysteroscopic Endometrial Resection Versus Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy for Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

To compare long-term efficacy of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) and hysteroscopic endometrial ablation (HEA) in treating persistent abnormal uterine bleeding.