Published in

American Geophysical Union, Journal of Geophysical Research, D13(111), 2006

DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006672

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of satellite – derived UV irradiances with Ground – based measurements at four European stations

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Satellite-derived ultraviolet (UV) irradiances may form the basis for estab-lishing a global UV climatology, provided that their accuracy is confirmed against ground-based measurements of known quality. In this study quality-checked spectral UV irradiance measurements from four European stations (Sodankyla, Finland; Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Ispra, Italy; and Thessaloniki, Greece) are compared with those derived from TOMS, based on the (version 8) dataset. The aim of this study is to validate the TOMS UV irradiances and to investigate the origin of disagreements with ground based data. Comparisons showed that TOMS overestimates summertime noon CIE-weighted irradiances from 6.6% at the high-latitude site of Sodankyla up to 19% for the three other sites. The influ-ence of clouds and aerosols on the observed differences was investigated. For the other three sites (Bilthoven, Ispra and Thessaloniki) TOMS overestimates the irradiance at 324nm by almost 15% even under conditions with cloud optical depth of less than 5. For cloud- free days at Ispra and Thessaloniki, differences ranging between 3% and 20% are well correlated with aerosol optical depth.