Published in

2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2008.4739365

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Search decisions for teams of automata.

Proceedings article published in 2008 by Dimitar Baronov, John Baillieul ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The dynamics of exploration vs exploitation decisions are explored in the context of robotic search problems. Building on prior work on robotic search together with our own work on reactive control laws for potential field mapping, we propose a new set of search protocols for teams of sensor-enabled mobile robots. The focus is on collaborative strategies for the search of potential fields that are possibly time varying. We pose the problem of quickly finding regions where the potential achieves or exceeds a certain threshold. The search protocol has two distinct components. In an ¿exploration phase¿, agents execute either a randomized or structured search, seeking places where the field achieves or exceeds the prescribed threshold. Once a threshold point is reached, the ¿exploitation¿ component is initialized and the agents deploy so as to rapidly map the evolving isoline associated with the given value of the field. Conservative strategies will emphasize refining the detailed knowledge of the field in a small neighborhood of the isoline, while aggressive strategies will emphasize wide-ranging exploration of neighboring territory. The main decision problem under study involves finding the optimally aggressive exploration strategy. Additionally, the problem of the allocation of the agents between ¿exploration¿ and ¿exploitation¿ is considered. A performance metric is developed to compare the proposed methods with standard approaches such as random search and distributed raster scans.