Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 4(16), p. 351-361

DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2004.9522626

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Peace in ground beetle larvae: non-aggressive outcome inChlaeniusspp. larvae interactions

Journal article published in 2004 by T. Zetto Brandmayr, T. Bonacci, A. Massolo ORCID, P. Brandmayr
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Cannibalism reduces the number of competitors and provides high-quality food, but it may have costs related to the risk of injury, disease/parasite transmission and reduction of inclusive fitness. Carabid larvae are usually very aggressive, with very low, tolerance of conspecifics. Thus cannibalism is common. We investigated aggressive and cannibalistic behaviour in the larvae-of eight ground beetle species, especially Chlaenius velutinus and Chlaenius spoliatus whose larvae have long articulated cerci. Chlaenius species live in dense populations with frequent intra-specific encounters, whereas encounters are rare in the other species. Dyads of conspecific larvae of the eight ground beetles species were tested for aggressive and cannibalistic behaviour. Unlike the other six species, larvae of the two Chlaenius species avoid cannibalism, possibly as a consequence of a behavioural display involving cerci interactions. This display was never recorded in conspecific larval interactions of the other species. Instead, cannibalism consistently occurred (20 to 50%) following aggressive interactions (1.2 to 2.6 attacks/event). The non-aggressive outcome in Chlaenius larval interactions contrasts with the high aggressiveness (35 to 85% of trials) shown by the other species. This suggests the presence of an inhibitory mechanism in the Chlaenius species. The cerci interaction probably inhibits cannibalism via intra-specific recognition; this behaviour may have evolved under the pressure of ecological factors (resource abundance and dispersion, larvae-density, frequency of encounters). In Chlaenius spp. ecological constraints may have led to an inconvenient costs/benefits trade-off, while in other species-they did not exert negative pressure on the occurrence of cannibalism.