Published in

American Society of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 3(21), p. 514-519, 2003

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.03.040

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Pegfilgrastim Compared With Daily Filgrastim After Chemotherapy for Lymphoma

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Purpose: The primary objective was to assess the duration of grade 4 neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 × 109/L) after one cycle of chemotherapy with etoposide, methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in patients randomly assigned to receive one dose of pegfilgrastim or daily filgrastim after chemotherapy. Febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profiles, time to neutrophil recovery, pharmacokinetics, and safety were also assessed. Patients and Methods: An open-label, randomized, phase II study was designed to compare the effects of a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (sustained-duration filgrastim) 100 μg/kg per chemotherapy cycle (n = 33) with daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 μg/kg (n = 33) in patients receiving salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Results: The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups was 69% and 68%, respectively. In addition, the mean duration of grade 4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (2.8 and 2.4 days, respectively). The results for the two groups were also not significantly different for febrile neutropenia, neutrophil profile, time to neutrophil recovery, or toxicity profile. A single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 μg/kg produced a sustained serum concentration relative to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim. Filgrastim-treated patients received a median of 11 injections per cycle. Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated in this patient population. A single injection of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle provided neutrophil support with safety and efficacy similar to that provided by daily injections of filgrastim. Once-per-cycle administration of pegfilgrastim simplifies the management of neutropenia and may have important clinical benefits for patients and healthcare providers.