Published in

Springer Verlag, Cerebellum

DOI: 10.1007/s12311-015-0731-3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Cerebellar Control on Prefrontal-Motor Connectivity During Movement Inhibition

Journal article published in 2015 by Silvia Picazio, Viviana Ponzo, Giacomo Koch ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests a crucial role of right inferior frontal gyrus (r-IFG) and right pre-supplementary motor area (r-preSMA) in movement inhibition control. The present work was aimed to investigate how the effective connectivity between these prefrontal areas and the primary motor cortex could change depending on the activity of the cerebellar cortex. Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered in healthy subjects over the r-IFG/left primary motor area (l-M1) and over r-preSMA/l-M1 before (100 ms after the fixation cross onset) and 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 ms after the presentation of a Go/NoGo visual cue establishing the specific time course and the causal interactions of these regions in relation to l-M1 as measured by motor evoked potentials (MEPs). The same paired-pulse protocol was applied following sham or real cerebellar continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). Following sham cTBS, for NoGo trials only, MEPs collected showed the expected pattern of activation for both r-IFG-l-M1 and r-preSMA-l-M1 connectivity, characterized by peaks of increased and decreased MEP amplitude regularly repeated every 50 ms. Following cerebellar cTBS, this pattern of activation related to NoGo trials was modified selectively for the r-IFG-M1 but not for r-preSMA-M1 connection. A common monitoring action of r-IFG and r-preSMA in inhibitory control was confirmed. The effects of cerebellar cTBS showed a specific interaction between cerebellum and r-IFG activity during the inhibitory process.