Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Springer Verlag, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 9(24), p. 2255-2264

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4974-6

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of a SiO2-CaO-ZnO-SrO glass polyalkenoate cement to commercial dental materials: Ion release, biocompatibility and antibacterial properties

Journal article published in 2013 by A. W. Wren, A. Coughlan, M. M. Hall, M. J. German ORCID, M. R. Towler
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Ion Release and biocompatibility of a CaO-SrO-ZnO-SiO2 (BT 101) based glass polyalkenoate cement (GPC) was compared against commercial GPCs, Fuji IX and Ketac Molar. The radiopacity (R) was similar for each material, 2.0-2.8. Ion release was evaluated on each material over 1, 7, 30 and 90 days. BT 101 release included Ca (23 mg/L), Sr (23 mg/L) Zn (13 mg/L), Si (203 mg/L). Fuji IX release includes Ca (0.7 mg/L), Al (3 mg/L) Si (26 mg/L), Na (60 mg/L) and P (0.5 mg/L) while Ketac Molar release includes Ca (1 mg/L), Al (0.6 mg/L) Si (23 mg/L), Na (76 mg/L) and P (0.7 mg/L). Simulated body fluid trials revealed CaP surface precipitation on BT 101. No evidence of precipitation was found on Fuji IX or Ketac Molar. Cytotoxicity testing found similar cell viability values for each material (~60 %, P = 1.000). Antibacterial testing determined a reduced CFU count with BT 101 (2.5 × 10(3)) when compared to the control bacteria (2.4 × 10(4)), Fuji IX (1.5 × 10(4)) and Ketac Molar (1.2 × 10(4)).