American Physiological Society, Journal of Applied Physiology, 4(93), p. 1498-1505, 2002
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00381.2002
Full text: Download
This study determined whether “living high-training low” (LHTL)-simulated altitude exposure increased the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) in well-trained endurance athletes. Thirty-three cyclists/triathletes were divided into three groups: 20 consecutive nights of hypoxic exposure (LHTLc, n = 12), 20 nights of intermittent hypoxic exposure (four 5-night blocks of hypoxia, each interspersed with 2 nights of normoxia, LHTLi, n = 10), or control (Con, n = 11). LHTLc and LHTLi slept 8–10 h/day overnight in normobaric hypoxia (∼2,650 m); Con slept under ambient conditions (600 m). Resting, isocapnic HVR (ΔV˙e/ΔSpO2 , whereV˙e is minute ventilation and SpO2 is blood O2 saturation) was measured in normoxia before hypoxia (Pre), after 1, 3, 10, and 15 nights of exposure (N1, N3, N10, and N15, respectively), and 2 nights after the exposure night 20 (Post). Before each HVR test, end-tidal Pco 2(Pet CO2 ) and V˙e were measured during room air breathing at rest. HVR (l · min−1 · %−1) was higher ( P < 0.05) in LHTLc than in Con at N1 (0.56 ± 0.32 vs. 0.28 ± 0.16), N3 (0.69 ± 0.30 vs. 0.36 ± 0.24), N10 (0.79 ± 0.36 vs. 0.34 ± 0.14), N15 (1.00 ± 0.38 vs. 0.36 ± 0.23), and Post (0.79 ± 0.37 vs. 0.36 ± 0.26). HVR at N15 was higher ( P < 0.05) in LHTLi (0.67 ± 0.33) than in Con and in LHTLc than in LHTLi. Pet CO2 was depressed in LHTLc and LHTLi compared with Con at all points after hypoxia ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for V˙e at any point. We conclude that LHTL increases HVR in endurance athletes in a time-dependent manner and decreases Pet CO2 in normoxia, without change inV˙e. Thus endurance athletes sleeping in mild hypoxia may experience changes to the respiratory control system.