Published in

American Chemical Society, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 39(114), p. 16174-16180, 2010

DOI: 10.1021/jp103137e

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Stability and Catalytic Kinetics of Horseradish Peroxidase Confined in Nanoporous SBA-15

Journal article published in 2010 by Hideki Ikemoto, Qijin Chi ORCID, Jens Ulstrup
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We have synthesized nanoporous silica, SBA-15, in the 1 μm size range with the pore diameter of 7.6 nm. The redox enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was entrapped in the pores to form nanostructured hybrid materials. The catalytic activity of free and immobilized enzyme was first compared at room temperature. Details of the enzyme kinetics including the apparent Michaelis constant (KM) and maximum rate (Vmax) were determined. Both thermal stability and stability, toward the denaturing agents guanidinium chloride and urea, of free and immobilized enzymes were compared next. The thermal stability of the immobilized enzyme is significantly improved in comparison with free HRP. The catalytic kinetics is slowed down notably, but Vmax is much more robust to heat than the free enzyme. The stability resistance of the enzyme toward the denaturing agents depends on the chemical nature of the denaturing agents and interactions between enzyme and silica nanopore walls. Guanidinium chloride showed similar attenuation of the catalytic activity of immobilized and free enzyme. In contrast, the immobilized HRP was much more resistant to urea than the free enzyme. The different behavior of free and immobilized enzyme is most likely due to different hydrogen bonding of water and increased hydration strength of the protein inside the nanopores.