Published in

Elsevier, Cement and Concrete Composites, (44), p. 69-76

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.05.008

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Ethyl silicate for surface protection of concrete: Performance in comparison with other inorganic surface treatments

Journal article published in 2013 by Elisa Franzoni ORCID, Barbara Pigino, Carlo Pistolesi
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The protection of concrete surface from environmental aggressions is often a basic issue for the enhancement of its durability. Due to the unsatisfactory long-term performance of many organic products and the subsequent need for frequent re-application, growing interest has been recently addressed toward inorganic materials. In the present study, ethyl silicate, widely used for the consolidation of weathered stones in architectural restoration and recently investigated for surface treatment of reinforced concrete structures, is compared with some inorganic products based on sodium silicate and nanosilica, generally used for the protection of concrete floors. Performance and effectiveness of the treatments are investigated in terms of morphology and microstructure; water absorption rate; water contact angle; chloride, carbonation and abrasion resistances. The results obtained highlight ethyl silicate, among the products investigated, as the most effective protection treatment for reinforced concrete structural elements.