Published in

European Geosciences Union, Climate of the Past, 1(9), p. 377-391, 2013

DOI: 10.5194/cp-9-377-2013

European Geosciences Union, Climate of the Past Discussions, 4(8), p. 2853-2892

DOI: 10.5194/cpd-8-2853-2012

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Reconstruction of drip-water δ<sup>18</sup>O based on calcite oxygen and clumped isotopes of speleothems from Bunker Cave (Germany)

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The geochemical signature of many speleothems used for reconstruction of past continental climates is af-fected by kinetic isotope fractionation. This limits quanti-tative paleoclimate reconstruction and, in cases where the kinetic fractionation varies with time, also affects relative paleoclimate interpretations. In carbonate archive research, clumped isotope thermometry is typically used as proxy for absolute temperatures. In the case of speleothems, however, clumped isotopes provide a sensitive indicator for disequilib-rium effects. The extent of kinetic fractionation co-varies in 47 and δ 18 O so that it can be used to account for disequilib-rium in δ 18 O and to extract the past drip-water composition. Here we apply this approach to stalagmites from Bunker Cave (Germany) and calculate drip-water δ 18 O w values for the Eemian, MIS3, and the Holocene, relying on indepen-dent temperature estimates and accounting for disequilib-rium. Applying the co-variation method to modern calcite precipitates yields drip-water δ 18 O w values in agreement with modern cave drip-water δ 18 O w of −7.9 ± 0.3 ‰, de-spite large and variable disequilibrium effects in both cal-cite δ 18 O c and 47 . Reconstructed paleo-drip-water δ 18 O w values are lower during colder periods (e.g., MIS3: −8.6 ± 0.4 ‰ and the early Holocene at 11 ka: −9.7 ± 0.2 ‰) and show higher values during warmer climatic periods (e.g., the Eemian: −7.6 ± 0.2 ‰ and the Holocene Climatic Optimum: −7.2 ± 0.3 ‰). This new approach offers a unique possibil-ity for quantitative climate reconstruction including the as-sessment of past hydrological conditions while accounting for disequilibrium effects.