Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Royal Society of Chemistry, Chemical Science, 4(6), p. 2532-2552, 2015

DOI: 10.1039/c4sc03906h

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Computational Study of the Mechanism and Selectivity of Ruthenium-Catalyzed Hydroamidations of Terminal Alkynes

Journal article published in 2015 by Bholanath Maity, Lukas J. Goossen ORCID, Debasis Koley
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Density functional theory calculations were performed to elucidate the mechanism of the ruthenium-catalyzed hydroamidation of terminal alkynes, a powerful and sustainable method for the stereoselective synthesis of enamides. The results provide an explanation for the puzzling experimental finding that with tri-n-butylphosphine (P(Bu)3) as the ligand, the E-configured enamides are obtained, whereas the stereoselectivity is inverted in favor of the Z-configured enamides with (dicyclohexylphosphino)methane (dcypm) ligands. Using the addition of pyrrolidinone to 1-hexyne as a model reaction, various pathways were investigated, among which a catalytic cycle turned out to be most advantageous for both ligand systems that consists of: a) oxidative addition, b) alkyne coordination, c) alkyne insertion d) vinyl-vinylidene rearrangement, e) nucleophilic transfer and finally f) reductive elimination. The stereoselectivity of the reaction is decided in the nucleophilic transfer step. For the P(Bu)3 ligand, the butyl moiety is oriented anti to the incoming 2-pyrolidinyl unit during the nucleophilic transfer step, whereas for the dcypm ligand, steric repulsion between the butyl and cyclohexyl groups turns it into a syn orientation. Overall, the formation of E-configured product is favorable by 5.0 kcal/mol (Δ‡GLS) for the catalytic cycle computed with P(Bu)3 as ancillary ligand, whereas for the catalytic cycle computed with dcypm ligands, the Z-product is favored by 5.9 kcal/mol (Δ‡GLS). These calculations are in excellent agreement with experimental findings.