Published in

Cell Press, Trends in Plant Science, 3(18), p. 157-166, 2013

DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.07.004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many?

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In the review article ‘CCAAT-box binding transcription factors in plants: Y so many’ by Tom Laloum, Stéphane De Mita, Pascal Gamas, Maël Baudin, and Andreas Niebel, which was published in the March 2013 issue of Trends in Plant Science, the procedure used for reconstructing the phylogenetic trees in Figure 2 was incorrectly described. The sentence ‘The tree has been reconstructed using maximum likelihood under the general time-reversible model as implemented in the PhyML software’ should read ‘The tree has been reconstructed using maximum likelihood under the LG model as implemented in the PhyML software’. This change to the figure legend does not affect the conclusions mentioned in the paper. Below is the corrected version of Figure 2: (voir PDF) Erratum, Trends in Plant Science, volume 18, issue 10, 594-595 ; Transcription factors belonging to the CCAAT-box binding factor family (also known as the Nuclear Factor Y) are present in all higher eukaryotes. Studies in plants have revealed that each subunit of this heterotrimeric transcription factor is encoded by a gene belonging to a multigene family allowing a considerable modularity. In this review, we focus on recent findings concerning the expression patterns and potential functions of different members of these NF-Y protein families using a phylogenetic approach. During the course of evolution plant CCAAT-box binding factors seem to have diversified into at least two main groups. The first group has more general expression patterns and/or functions whereas the second group has acquired more specific expression patterns and/or functions and could play key roles in specific pathways.