Published in

Elsevier, Energy for Sustainable Development, (29), p. 81-90

DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2015.10.004

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Life-Cycle Assessment of coal–biomass based electricity in Chile: Focus on using raw vs torrefied wood

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this article, the environmental impacts associated to cofiring coal with forest biomass for electricity production in Chile are analyzed for: (i) untreated pine pellets and (ii) torrefied-pretreated pine pellets. Results show that energy production from cofiring coal/untreated wood pellets or coal/torrefied pellets, featured significant reductions in environmental impacts, as compared with pure coal plants. Indeed, reductions in acidification (28–26%), abiotic depletion (15–7%), eutrophication potential (15–12%), global warming potential (16–6%), photochemical oxidation (28–23%), human toxicity (17–15%), terrestrial ecotoxicity (12–9%), and marine aquatic ecotoxicity (17–15%) were obtained when untreated or treated pellets were used as a substitute for coal. Moreover, the environmental profile of torrefied pine evidenced its low impact per energy unit, in most of the studied categories except for eutrophication and marine aquatic ecotoxicity, for which the harvesting, logistic chain and torrefaction processes were the most important contributors.