Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Validation of the global evapotranspiration algorithm (MOD16) in two contrasting tropical land cover types

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Question mark in circle
Preprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Postprint: policy unknown
Question mark in circle
Published version: policy unknown

Abstract

This article present results from the NASA's EOS MOD16 Project, which aims to estimate global evapotranspiration (ET) using remote sensing and meteorological data. Our specific objective in this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the newly improved MOD16 algorithm at the Rio Grande basin, southern Brazil, using (i) ET observations at two eddy covariance (EC) flux tower sites in different land covers (savanna and sugar-cane plantations) and (ii) ET estimations from hydrological model during the year 2001. Our results show that MOD16 8-days average, monthly ET and annual ET values are consistent with observations of the two EC sites and the hydrological model. The RMSE and bias analyses indicate that the model overestimates ET values for savannas and underestimates these values for the sugar-cane and the whole basin average. Estimates are very consistent in the dry season, while the larger prediction errors occur in the wet season.