Published in

Elsevier Masson, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2-4(114), p. 185-194

DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.10.007

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Odour episodes in the vicinity of livestock buildings: A qualitative comparison of odour complaint statistics with model calculations

Journal article published in 2006 by G. Schauberger, M. Piringer ORCID, E. Petz
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

In this paper we compare odour complaint statistics of various sites in Europe, South Africa and North America with calculated odour sensation at a site in Austria, which can be used as a typical example of a well-ventilated area with prevailing west wind and a superimposed weak influence of a mountain wind system. A major goal of this work is the discussion of the general time pattern of complaint statistics and the discrepancy with the occurrence of odour sensation calculated by a dispersion model.The Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM) is a Gaussian model suitable for the prediction of ambient odour concentrations. Based on cumulative frequency distributions of calculated odour concentrations at receptor points, separation distances are obtained defined by odour impact criteria chosen as a combination of odour threshold and probability of threshold exceedance. At these separation distances, depending on the wind direction, the occurrence of odour sensation is analysed and compared with the well-known time pattern of the complaint statistics for odour.Here, the AODM is used to calculate separation distances for an odour threshold of 1odour unit (OU) per cubic metre exceeded in 3% of the year. At a site in the Austrian North-alpine foreland, direction-dependent separation distances for a 1000 head pig unit (calculated on the basis of a 2-year time series of meteorological data) lie between 99m for northerly winds and 362m for westerly winds. For these direction-dependent separation distances we analysed when odour sensation can be expected in relation to meteorological parameters as well time of the day and year. For the main wind directions, West and East and odour sensation can be expected more often for higher wind velocities and a neutrally or stably stratified atmosphere around sunset. North and South winds show the typical diurnal variation of a local valley wind system with predominantly northerly daytime up-valley and southerly night-time down-valley winds. Odour sensation is therefore most likely around noon for North wind and during night-time for South wind. This time pattern of the calculated odour sensation does not fit to the time pattern of the complaint statistics, which shows complaints to occur predominantly in the afternoon and evening hours of the warm season when residents are outside. The presented comparison of odour complaint statistics with the calculated odour episodes is a helpful tool to find out when odour is perceived as most annoying. As a result, the evaluation of these values by the odour impact criteria should not only be based on statistical limits as it is done today but also by considering the annoying potential of odour due to the behaviour of the neighbours. Therefore the odour episode should be weighted by the time of the day and time of the year, as it is done with the limit values for noise.