Published in

Cambridge University Press, British Journal of Psychiatry, 4(194), p. 293-295, 2009

DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058479

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Why psychiatry can't afford to be neurophobic

Journal article published in 2009 by Ed Bullmore, Paul Fletcher, Peter B. Jones ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

SummaryThe original vision of psychiatry was as a medicine – or physic – of the mind. If psychiatry aspires to be a progressive modern medicine of the mind, it should be fully engaged with the science of the brain. We summarise and rebut three countervailing or ‘neurophobic’ propositions and aim to show that not one provides a compelling argument for neurophobia. We suggest that there are several ways in which psychiatry could organise itself professionally to better advance and communicate the theoretical and therapeutic potential of a brain-based medicine of the mind.