Published in

Inter Research, Marine Ecology Progress Series, (304), p. 15-29

DOI: 10.3354/meps304015

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Vertical variability of wild fish assemblages around sea-cage fish farms: Implications for management

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Wild fish were counted in 4 depth-related strata (bottom, midwater, cage and surface) around 3 floating sea-cage fish farms (Altea, Campello, Guardamar) along the Spanish coastline and 2 farms (Los Cristianos, San Andres) in the Canary Islands. Almost 200000 wild fish belonging to 53 species were seen; representatives of Sparidae (8 species), Carangidae (6 species), Mugilidae (5 species) and Chondrichthyid rays (7 species) were commonly observed. At all 5 farms, I to 3 taxa accounted for > 74% of the abundance and > 94% of the biomass of aggregated wild fish. Abundances (5.7 to 162 times) and biomasses (42 to 1728 times) of wild fish were higher in the cage stratum at the 3 Mediterranean farms than at, the bottom. In contrast, abundances and biomasses of wild fish at the Canary Island farms were highest at the bottom at San Andres and highest at the surface at Los Cristianos. Large differences in the sizes of associated fish existed among farms, with low percentages of fish > 20 cm total length at Guardamar, Los Cristianos and San Andres (11 to 25%) compared to Altea and Campello (81 to 95%). However, the greatest proportions of large fish were present in the cage stratum at each of the 5 farms, This variability suggests that assemblage structure and aggregated biomass of wild fish at farms cannot be predicted prior to their installation, causing uncertainty in modelling of nutrient dispersal. Further, the sedimentation 'footprint' of temperate sea-cage fish farms may vary depending on (1) the species and biomass of associated wild fish, and (2) where these fish are distributed in the water column. As wild fish consume lost feed and assimilate nutrients, we suggest that coastal managers prohibit fishing of large planktivorous species at farms to fully harness their ability to ameliorate benthic impacts.