Published in

Elsevier, Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2-3(69), p. 129-138

DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.06.003

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Upward-looking ground-penetrating radar for measuring wet-snow properties

Journal article published in 2011 by Christoph Mitterer, Achim Heilig, Jürg Schweizer, Olaf Eisen ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Snow stratigraphy information is among other sources the key data for assessing avalanche danger—not only for dry snow but also for wet-snow conditions. Until now this information is obtained by traditional snow pit observations or more recently by applying more quantitative methods such as the snow micro-penetrometer or dielectric devices. All these methods are destructive and only provide a snap shot in time of snowpack evolution. We used an upward-looking ground-penetrating radar system (upGPR) to monitor snowpack evolution on a daily or, whenever necessary, hourly basis to obtain information on wet-snow properties. We focused on determining the volumetric liquid water content (θw) by calculating the effective permittivity (εeff) of the wet snow above the radar antennas, the advance of a wetting front and the wet-snow stratigraphy. εeff was obtained using the signal velocity and snow depth recorded with nearby ultrasonic gauges; θw was calculated with different mixing model approaches. Results were compared to in-situ measured permittivity, modelled wetting front advance and modelled and measured outflow at the bottom of the snowpack. The upGPR system clearly showed the advance of a wetting front and the arrival time was similar to the one recorded with a nearby lysimeter. Possibly weak wet layers with high liquid water content (θw>6%) were detected within the radar signal by multiple reflections. However, determining the exact amount of liquid water for each layer separately is still a task for future research.