Published in

Elsevier, Respiratory Medicine, 6(104), p. 801-807, 2010

DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.12.002

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of eNO and histamine hyperresponsiveness in diagnosing asthma in new referrals

Journal article published in 2010 by P. Munnik, I. van der Lee, J. Fijn, L. J. van Eijsden, J.-W. J. Lammers, P. Zanen ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The mainstay of the diagnosis of asthma is the presence of reversible airway obstruction. Exhaled NO levels are increased in asthma, in close relationship with the amount of airway inflammation, and may be used for monitoring the disease and adjusting therapy. In this study we investigated the role of eNO as a diagnostic for asthma, compared with the FEV1-reversibility and the PC20 (20% decrease of the FEV1 in the bronchial histamine provocation test), in two independent centers, on an unselected population. ENO measurements were performed with chemoluminesence technique in one center and with an electrochemical device in the other. Only after correction for so-called nuisance factors (allergy, use of inhaled steroids, recent infection, smoking, sex and the use of nitrate food) the eNO appeared as a diagnostic with equal power as the FEV1-reversibility and the PC20. Therefore, screening for asthma in our study population, with the eNO measurement, is a simple, fast and safe strategy.