Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 6(81), p. 611-617

DOI: 10.1007/s11746-006-0950-3

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of steam and nitrogen in the physical deacidification of soybean oil

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Deacidification in physical refining is one of the most sensitive steps in refining edible vegetable oils because of its large impact on the quality of the oil. The removal of volatile compounds such as FFA is accomplished at elevated temperatures and a high vacuum with a stripping gas, usually steam. The aim of this work was to verify, at the laboratory level, the advantages of using an alternative stripping gas, nitrogen, instead of steam. An ideal vapor-liquid equilibrium model (lVLE) was used to compare the stripping capacities of steam and nitrogen and to analyze the effects of various operational parameters (temperature, pressure, amount of stripping gas) on the residual acidity of the oil. There was no clear evidence that nitrogen showed a higher capacity to strip FFA than steam. The IVLE model seemed suitable to describe FFA laboratory distillation by using steam or nitrogen, provided the final residual content of FFA was not too low. ; Peer reviewed