Published in

American Chemical Society, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 24(117), p. 12648-12660, 2013

DOI: 10.1021/jp402884h

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Adsorption on Fe-MOF-74 for C1-C3 hydrocarbon separation

Journal article published in 2013 by Pragya Verma, Xuefei Xu, Donald G. Truhlar ORCID
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
  • Must obtain written permission from Editor
  • Must not violate ACS ethical Guidelines
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

An increase in demand for energy efficient processes for the separation of a mixture of hydrocarbons drives the need for understanding metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) that can provide better noncryogenic alternatives for the fractionation of hydrocarbon mixtures. Here we study the structure and properties of a metal–organic framework, Fe-MOF-74, and its effectiveness to separate C1–C3 hydrocarbon mixtures. The binding of these hydrocarbons to the open metal sites of Fe-MOF-74 has been investigated using a meta-generalized gradient approximation density functional, M06-L, which has previously been validated for systems containing transition metals. For interpretive purposes, charge model 5 (CM5) is used to determine the partial atomic charges on the metal cations and the oxygen atoms of the ligands surrounding these metal centers. Our computations show preferential binding to the metal center of Fe-MOF-74 of unsaturated hydrocarbons over saturated ones in agreement with experimental results, and the calculated binding energies are in semiquantitative agreement with experiment. The results are analyzed in terms of various factors contributing to the binding, including structural distortion, electrostatics, damped dispersion, charge transfer, back bonding, and ligand field effects on the d orbitals. The CM5 charges are not sensitive to small differences in structure.