Published in

American Physical Society, Physical review E: Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 6(67), 2003

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.67.063901

American Physical Society, Physical review E: Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 6(72)

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.72.063901

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comment on "Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: A case study on electroencephalographic signals"

Journal article published in 2003 by R. B. Duckrow, R. Q. Quiroga ORCID, N. Nicolaou, S. J. Nasuto, A. M. Albano, A. Kraskov, P. Grassberger
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Upload
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Upload
Policy details
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Quian Quiroga et al. [Phys. Rev. E 65, 041903 (2002)] reported a similar performance of several linear and nonlinear measures of synchronization when applied to the rat electrocorticogram (ECoG). However, they found that the mutual information measure did not produce robust estimates of synchronization when compared to other measures. We reexamined their data using a histogram method with adaptive partitioning and found the mutual information to be a useful measure of regional ECoG interdependence.