Published in

European Respiratory Society, European Respiratory Journal, 5(43), p. 1326-1337

DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00145613

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

To study the overall content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs from a global perspective to get an initial appraisal on the degree of heterogeneity worldwide.A twelve-question survey on content and organizational aspects was completed by representatives of pulmonary rehabilitation programs that previously participated in the European Respiratory Society (ERS) COPD Audit. Moreover, all ERS members affiliated with the ERS Scientific Groups 01.02 (Rehabilitation and Chronic Care) and/or 09.02 (Physiotherapy), all members of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR), and all ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly members were asked to complete the survey via multiple e-mailings.The survey has been completed by representatives of 430 centres from 40 countries. The findings demonstrate large differences among pulmonary rehabilitation programs across continents for all aspects that were surveyed, including the setting, the case-mix of individuals with a chronic respiratory disease, composition of the pulmonary rehabilitation team, completion rates, methods of referral, and types of reimbursement.The current findings stress the importance of future development of process and performance metrics to monitor pulmonary rehabilitation programs, to be able to start international benchmarking, and to provide recommendations for international standards based on evidence and best practice.