Published in

Trans Tech Publications, Key Engineering Materials, (583), p. 101-106, 2013

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.583.101

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Alternative Approaches Using Animal Model for Implant Biomaterials: Advantages and Disadvantages

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

This study presents some aspects regarding the evaluation of bone-implant interactions using two animal models (rabbit and rat). The proposed implants are new alumina/zirconia bioceramics designed for hard tissue replacement (oral implantology or arthroplasty). The animal selection was made based on the number and size or design of implants to be tested as these factors influence directly the species of animal chosen for this study. The correct placement and stability of the implants were evaluated by radiographic images. SEM micrographs were recorded on the bone/implant area along with the elemental composition of the sheared implant surfaces at different time intervals after the surgery. Calcium/phosphate ratio was considered as an indicative of the surface implant coverage for a successful osseointegration. Histological examination of the bone and bone marrow in direct contact with the implants was performed to detect any immunological or inflammatory responses. Each of the animal species (rat or rabbit) demonstrated unique advantages and disadvantages as a model for demonstrating the response of bone tissue to an implant material. The size and design of the implants also influenced the bone turnover as demonstrated histologically.