Published in

Springer Nature [academic journals on nature.com], British Journal of Cancer, 6(94), p. 806-813, 2006

DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602975

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

A phase III trial comparing CHOP to PMitCEBO with or without G-CSF in patients aged 60 plus with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The management of older patients with aggressive non- Hodgkin's lymphoma presents a challenge to the physician. Age is a poor prognostic indicator, due to reduced ability to tolerate and maintain dose- intensive chemotherapy. Generally, older patients demonstrate a lower response rate, reduced survival and increased toxicity, although the majority of large randomised trials exclude older patients. This randomised trial was conducted in patients 60 years or over to compare CHOP ( cyclophosphamide 750 mg m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), vincristine 1.4 mg m(-2), prednisolone 100 mg) with PMitCEBO ( mitoxantrone 7mg m(-2), cyclophosphamide 300 mg m(-2), etoposide 150 mg m(-2), vincristine 1.4 mg m(-2), bleomycin 10 mg m(-2) and prednisolone 50 mg). Due to the myelosuppressive nature of these regimens, patients were also randomised to the addition of G- CSF. The formal results of this trial with long- term follow- up are now reported. Data were analysed to assess efficacy and toxicity. Overall response rate was 84% in the CHOP arm and 83% in the PMitCEBO arm, with overall response rates of 83% for the use of G- CSF and 84% for no G- CSF. At median 44 months follow- up, there was no significant difference in failure- free, progression- free or overall survival between the CHOP and PMitCEBO arms. At 3 years, the actuarial failure- free survival was 44% in CHOP recipients and 42% in PMitCEBO recipients and the 3- year actuarial overall survival was 46% and 45% respectively. There was no significant difference in the failure-free, progression- free or overall survival with the addition of G- CSF