Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 3-4(302), p. 381-395

DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.01.024

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Why do foliar physiognomic climate estimates sometimes differ from those observed? Insights from taphonomic information loss and a CLAMP case study from the Ganges Delta

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Palaeoclimate estimates derived from plant-based proxies are potentially subject to uncertainties arising from taphonomic filtering. In any given fossil assemblage it is possible to identify the kinds of likely taphonomic influences, but virtually impossible to quantify the uncertainties they introduce because filtering removes information. Because that information is missing it cannot be measured. An alternative approach is to measure the maximum uncertainty possible due to specific information loss within recognised analytical protocols.