Published in

American Association for Cancer Research, Cancer Discovery, 2(3), p. 212-223, 2013

DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0271

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Antagonism of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins Increases Bone Metastasis via Unexpected Osteoclast Activation

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Abstract Inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins play a central role in many types of cancer, and IAP antagonists are in development as anticancer agents. IAP antagonists cause apoptosis in many cells, but they also activate alternative NF-κB signaling through NF-κB–inducing kinase (NIK), which regulates osteoclasts. In bone metastasis, a positive feedback loop between tumors and osteoclasts promotes tumor growth and osteolysis. We therefore tested the effect of IAP antagonists on the bone microenvironment for metastasis. In both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tumors, growth in bone was favored, as compared with other sites during IAP antagonist treatment. These drugs also caused osteoporosis and increased osteoclastogenesis, mediated by NIK, and enhanced tumor-associated osteolysis. Cotreatment with zoledronic acid, a potent osteoclast inhibitor, reduced IAP antagonist–enhanced tumor growth in bone and osteolysis. Thus, IAP antagonist–based cancer treatment may be compromised by osteoporosis and enhanced skeletal metastasis, which may be prevented by antiresorptive agents. Significance: Although IAP antagonists are a class of anticancer agents with proven efficacy in multiple cancers, we show that these agents can paradoxically increase tumor growth and metastasis in the bone by stabilizing NIK and activating the alternative NF-κB pathway in osteoclasts. Future clinical trials of IAP antagonist–based therapy may require detailed examination of this potential for enhanced bone metastasis and osteoporosis, as well as possible combination with antiresorptive agents. Cancer Discov; 3(2); 212–23. ©2012 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 125