Published in

Elsevier, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 8-9(71), p. 975-982, 2009

DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.04.009

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparison of LLR, MLP, Elman, NNARX and ANFIS models with a case study in solar radiation estimation

Journal article published in 2009 by A. Moghaddamnia, R. Remesan, M. Hassanpour Kashani, M. Mohammadi, D. Han, J. Piri ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Despite the widespread application of nonlinear mathematical models, comparative studies of different models are still a huge task for modellers. This is because a large number of trial and error processes are needed to develop each model, so the workload will be multiplied into an unmanageable level if many types of models are involved. This study presents an efficient approach by using the Gamma test (GT) to select the input variables and the training data length, so that the trial and error workload can be greatly reduced. The methodology is tested in estimating solar radiation at the Brue catchment, UK. Several nonlinear models have been developed efficiently with the aid of the GT, including local linear regression, multi-layer perceptron (MLP), Elman neural network, neural network auto-regressive model with exogenous inputs (NNARX) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). This work is only feasible within the time and resources constraint, due to the GT in reducing huge workload of the trial and error process.