Published in

Springer Verlag, Surgical Endoscopy, 12(17), p. 1914-1918

DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9070-4

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection: a comparative study

Journal article published in 2003 by M. Morino ORCID, I. Morra, E. Rosso, C. Miglietta, C. Garrone
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the feasibility of minor laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) has been demonstrated, data comparing the open vs the laparoscopic approach to liver resection are lacking. METHODS: We compared 30 LLR with 30 open liver resections (OLR) in a pair-matched analysis. The indications for resection were malignant disease in 47% of the LLR and 83% of the OLR. The average size of the lesions was 42 mm for LLR and 41 mm for OLR. Five wedge resections, 12 segmentectomies, and 13 bisegmentectomies were performed in each group. RESULTS: The conversion rate for LLR was nil. The mean operative time was 148 min for LLR and 142 min for OLR. Mean blood loss was minimal in the LLR group (320 vs 479 ml; p