Published in

Elsevier, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, (288), p. 155-167

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.002

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Aspects of calculating first-order reversal curve distributions

Journal article published in 2005 by David Heslop ORCID, Adrian R. Muxworthy
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The recent development of first-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams has allowed the detailed investigation of coercivity spectra, interactions, and domain states of fine particle magnetic systems. However, calculation of a FORC distribution from the measured magnetisation data using a second-order trend surface fitted in a piecewise manner (J. Appl. Phys. (1999) 6660; J. Geophys. Res. 105 (2000) 28461) can be a time consuming task and it is not yet clear what criteria are suitable for selecting the level of smoothing that should be applied to the data.Here the convolution method of Savitzky and Golay (Anal. Chem. 36 (1964) 1627) is adapted to a two-dimensional form and is found to accelerate the calculation of a FORC distribution substantially (by a factor of ∼500), producing results that are identical to those obtained with the existing method. To provide a quantitative measure of the deviation of a smoothed FORC diagram from the measured magnetisation data we present a simple method that allows reconstruction of the smoothed FORCs and an assessment of the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. Finally, a methodology based on spatial autocorrelation (Biometrika (1950) 17) is employed to determine the level of smoothing which can be performed before the smoothing process distorts the representation of the FORC distribution. In numerical tests this method appears to be highly effective in selecting smoothing levels that remove a substantial proportion of the noise contribution from the data without unduly affecting the form of the FORC distribution.