Published in

Elsevier, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 3(11), p. 229-238

DOI: 10.1006/brbi.1997.0503

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Differential Effect of Lipopolysaccharide on Food Hoarding Behavior and Food Consumption in Rats

Journal article published in 1997 by A. Aubert, K. W. Kelley, R. Dantzer ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Experimental studies assessing the suppressing effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on feeding behavior have focused exclusively on the ingestive component of this behaviour without taking into account its appetitive component. The appetitive sequence of feeding behavior regroups activities animals engage in to gain access to food without necessarily eating it. The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of LPS on food intake and food hoarding. Rats were given the possibility to access food during a 30-min daily session in an apparatus consisting of a cage connected to an alley with free food at its end. Subjects were tested under different motivational levels for food hoarding: a first group (FS) received a food supplement to maintain stable body weight while a second group (noFS) did not receive such a supplement. LPS (250 micrograms/kg i.p.) dramatically decreased total food intake in rats from both groups whereas food hoarding was much less affected in LPS-treated rats from the noFS group. This expression of a still salient secondary motivation in LPS-treated rats which did not receive any food supplement can be interpreted to suggest the expression of an anticipatory feeding behavior along with a reduced immediate appetite. In addition, LPS had no effect, in rats from the noFS group, on the amount of food eaten after transport to the refuge. LPS-treated animals still appear to be able to adjust their defensive behavioral strategies with regard to their needs and capacities. These findings support the adaptive value of the behavioral changes displayed by LPS-treated animals.