Published in

Elsevier Masson, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, (188), p. 264-274

DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.002

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions within double rice cropping systems

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The amendment of biochar derived from crop residues to soil has been proposed as a potential mitigation strategy for tackling greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cropping systems. A field experiment was carried out to investigate GHG emissions from rice paddy fields treated with straw incorporation and straw-derived biochar amendment at various rates during two consecutive rice growing seasons in double rice cropping systems. The treatments included the following: control (no straw incorporation and no biochar amendment), low straw (rice straw incorporated at 3 t ha−1), high straw (rice straw incorporated at 6 t ha−1), low biochar (straw-derived biochar amended at 7.5 t ha−1 in 2011 and adjusted to 24 t ha−1 in 2012) and high biochar (straw-derived biochar amended at 22.5 t ha−1 in 2011 and adjusted to 48 t ha−1 in 2012). The results showed that straw incorporation significantly increased CH4 emissions relative to the control treatment, whereas biochar amendment significantly reduced CH4 emissions at the highest application rates (48 t ha−1), possibly due to a biochar-induced increase in soil pH. The seasonal cumulative CH4 emissions from the low and high straw treatments were 3.0–4.1 and 6.4–8.6 times greater, respectively, in the 2011 late rice season and 7–13 and 13–23 times greater, respectively, in the 2012 early rice season than those from both biochar treatments. In contrast, N2O emissions decreased by 26–68% in comparison with the control when straw was applied to the soil, but increased by 0.13–0.80 times in the presence of biochar, possibly due to the increased availability of NH4+ or NO3− originating from the added biochar. The seasonal cumulative N2O emissions were relatively low (15–200 g N ha−1) across all the treatments. The estimated seasonal gross global warming potentials (GWP) of CH4 plus N2O among the treatments showed a similar pattern to the seasonal cumulative CH4 emissions due to the dominance of CH4 to gross GWP (83–99% of the total). As rice straw incorporation also reduced rice grain yield, especially during the early rice season, the yield-scaled GWPs were even higher in the straw amendment treatments compared with the biochar treatments (3.2–4.0 and 7.1–8.8 times in 2011 and 9.4–13 and 18–25 times in 2012 for the low and high straw treatments, respectively). The lower gross and yield-scaled GWPs in paddy fields amended with biochar indicated that transforming straw to biochar and subsequent addition to paddy fields has potential to mitigate GHG emissions in double rice cropping systems.