Published in

Volume 6: Structures and Dynamics, Parts A and B

DOI: 10.1115/gt2010-22262

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Failure Investigation of the 69 MW Gas Turbine of Combined Cycle Unit

This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A compressor blade failure was experienced at the 69 MW gas turbine of a combined cycle (C.C.) unit after four years operation since the last overhaul (January 2005). The unit accumulated 27,000 service hours and 97 start-ups since the last overhaul. This unit consists of four gas turbine stages and 19 compressor stages and operates at 3600 rpm. In 2006, the unit was equipped with a fogging system at the compressor air inlet duct to increment unit power output during high ambient temperature days (hot days). These fog water nozzles were installed upstream of the compressor inlet air filter without any water filter/catcher before the water spray nozzles. Three unit failure events occurred at small periods, which caused forced outage. The first failure occurred in December 2008, a second event in March 2009 and the third event in May 2009. Visual examination carried out after the first failure event indicated that the compressor vanes (diaphragms) had cracks in their airfoils initiating at blade tenons welded to the diaphragm outer shroud at stages 3, 8, 9, 10 and 11. Also, many stationary vanes and moving blades at each stage of the compressor showed foreign object damage (FOD) and fractures at the airfoil. Visual examination performed for the second failure event after 60 unit operation hours indicated that many compressor vanes (diaphragms) and moving blades had FOD at the airfoil. This was attributed to fractures of the fogging system water spray nozzle, which were then induced to the compressor flow path channel at high velocity causing the above-mentioned damage. Visual examination completed upon the third failure event after two unit startup attempts indicated damage of compressor stationary vanes and moving blades principally at stages 12 to 16, and also stages 17 to 19. The damage consisted of airfoil fracture in stationary vanes and moving blades, FOD, moving blade tip rubbing, and bending of stationary vanes, moving blades and diaphragm shrouds. A laboratory evaluation of stationary vane tenon fracture indicated a high cycle fatigue (HCF) failure mechanism, and crack initiation was accelerated by corrosion picks on blade surfaces due to high humidity air generated by the fogging system. Stationary vane damage was caused by a rotating stall phenomenon, which generates vibratory stresses in stationary vanes and moving blades during unit start-ups. During the third failure event, stationary vane HCF damage was highly accelerated due to pre-existent partial fractures in tenons generated during previous failure events, which had not been detected by non-destructive tests. Stationary vane and moving blade failure was also influenced by high tenon brittleness in stationary vanes and moving blades generated during manufacture by welding (diaphragms) and repair welding (moving blades) without adequate post-weld heat treatment (stress relieving). A compressor stationary vane and moving blade failure evaluation was completed. This investigation included cracked blade metallographic analysis, unit operation parameter analysis, history-of-events analysis, and crack initiation and propagation analysis. This paper provides an overview of the compressor failure investigation, which led to identification of the HCF failure mechanism generated by rotating stall during unit start-ups, highly accelerated by *Investigator and author of correspondence 1 Copyright © 2010 by ASME corrosion generated by the fogging system and influenced by high stationary vane and moving blade brittleness as the primary contribution to the observed failure.