Published in

Emerald, Journal of Integrated Care: Practical evidence for service improvement, 1(19), p. 3-11

DOI: 10.5042/jic.2011.0030

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Joined-up Rationing? An Analysis of Priority Setting in Health and Social Care Commissioning

Journal article published in 2011 by Iestyn Williams, Helen Dickinson, Suzanne Robinson ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Joint commissioning is an important part of the current health and social care context and will continue to be crucial in the future. An essential component of any commissioning process is priority setting, and this paper begins to explore the idea of integrated priority setting as a key element of health and social care commissioning. After setting out the key terminology in this area and the main priority-setting processes for health and social care, the paper describes a number of barriers that might be encountered in integrated priority setting. We argue that there are significant barriers in financing, accessibility, evidence and politics, and it is important that such barriers are acknowledged if priority setting is to become a component of joint commissioning. While these barriers are not insurmountable, the solution lies in engagement with a range of stakeholders, rather than simply a technical process.