Published in

SAGE Publications, Lupus, 2(19), p. 158-161, 2009

DOI: 10.1177/0961203309350319

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

FCGR3B copy number variation is not associated with lupus nephritis in a Chinese population

Journal article published in 2009 by J. Lv, Y. Yang, X. Zhou ORCID, L. Yu, R. Li, P. Hou, H. Zhang
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) is common in genomic regions encoding immune-related genes and can impact polygenic autoimmunity. FCGR3B CNV is associated with susceptibility to systemic autoimmunity in Caucasian populations. In this study, we examined FCGR3B CNV in patients with the autoimmune disease lupus nephritis (LN) in a Chinese population. The study includes 202 patients with histologically verified LN and 146 geographically matched healthy controls. To identify CNV at the FCGRB locus, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done with TaqMan TM probes and relative copy number was estimated with relative quantitative 2—ΔΔCt method. The distribution of FCGR3B relative copy number did not differ significantly between the LN patients and the controls (1.17 ± 0.42 for LN; 1.15 ± 0.37 for controls; p = 0.627). The difference was still not significant when the data were stratified by gender. There was no significant difference when the LN patients were divided by pathological phenotype (proliferative LN compared with non-proliferative p = 0.511; AI < 12 compared with AI ≥ 12, p = 0.401; and chronicity index (CI) < 4 compared with CI ≥ 4, p = 0.058) or lupus disease activity index (SLEDAI ≤ 10 compared with SLEDAI > 10, p = 0.996). The data suggest that FCGR3B CNV was not associated with LN development or progression in this Chinese population. These results were surprising given the strong in a Caucasian population. Lupus (2010) 19, 158—161.