Published in

Elsevier, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 6(74), p. 1762-1776

DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.12.010

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Competitive adsorption of strontium and fulvic acid at the muscovite–solution interface observed with resonant anomalous X-ray reflectivity

Journal article published in 2010 by Sang Soo Lee, Changyong Park ORCID, Paul Fenter, Neil C. Sturchio, Kathryn L. Nagy
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Postprint: archiving forbidden
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Molecular-scale distributions of Sr2+ and fulvic acid (FA) adsorbed on the muscovite (0 0 1) surface were investigated using in situ specular X-ray reflectivity (XR) and resonant anomalous X-ray reflectivity (RAXR). The total amount of Sr2+ adsorbed from a 1 × 10−2 mol/kg SrCl2 and 100 mg/kg Elliott Soil Fulvic Acid II (ESFA II) solution at pH 5.5 compensated 81 ± 5% of the muscovite surface charge, less than previously measured (118 ± 5%) in an ESFA II-free solution with the same Sr concentration and pH. Inner-sphere (IS) and outer-sphere (OS) Sr2+ constituted 87% of the total adsorbed species in IS:OS proportions of 19:81 compared to 42:58 in the solution without FA, suggesting that adsorbed FA competes with the IS Sr2+ for surface sites. The coverage of both IS and OS Sr2+ decreased even more in a pH 3.5 solution containing the same concentration of FA and 0.5 × 10−2 mol/kg Sr(NO3)2, whereas a significant amount of Sr2+ accumulated farther from the surface in the FA layer. The amount of Sr2+ incorporated in the ∼10 Å thick FA layer decreased by 79% with decreasing FA concentration (100 → 1 mg/kg) and increasing Sr2+ concentration (0.5 × 10−2 → 1 × 10−2 mol/kg) and pH (3.5 → 3.6). These results indicate not only that adsorbed FA molecules (and perhaps also H3O+) displace Sr2+ near the muscovite surface, but also that the sorbed FA film provides binding sites for additional Sr2+ away from the surface. When a muscovite crystal pre-coated with FA after reaction in a 100 mg/kg ESFA II solution for 50 h was subsequently reacted with a 0.5 × 10−2 mol/kg Sr(NO3)2 and 100 mg/kg ESFA II solution at pH 3.7, a significant fraction of Sr2+ was distributed in the outer part of the FA film similar to that observed on fresh muscovite reacted at pH 3.5 with a pre-mixed Sr–FA solution at the same concentrations. However, this Sr2+ sorbed in the pre-adsorbed organic film was more widely distributed and had a lower coverage, suggesting that pre-sorbed FA may undergo fractionation and/or conformational changes that diminish its capacity, and that of the muscovite (0 0 1) surface, for adsorbing the aqueous Sr cation.