Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Elsevier, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 1(37), p. 9-22, 2006

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.048

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Manufacturing cost comparison of thermoplastic and thermoset RTM for an automotive floor pan

Journal article published in 2006 by J. Verrey, M. D. Wakeman, V. Michaud ORCID, J.-A. E. Månson
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Two resin transfer moulding (RTM) processes have been examined for automotive body-in-white (BIW) structures. An epoxy system was compared with a novel reactive polyamide 12 (PA12) system via characterisation of reaction kinetics and the production of carbon fibre floor pan quadrant demonstrators incorporating typical geometrical features. Cost modelling tools were used to compare the two RTM variants for full floor-pan production at volumes of 12,500–60,000 parts per year. A 22% increase occurred for the standard TP-RTM cycle versus the epoxy system, principally due to thermal cycling of the tool that dominated the in-mould cycle time. Study of alternate preforming strategies showed that a reduction in non-crimp fabric scrap yielded major cost savings.