Published in

BMJ Publishing Group, BMJ, aug10 1(343), p. d5052-d5052, 2011

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d5052

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Charlotte Paterson and colleagues respond to Margaret McCartney

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The CACTUS Study is a randomised pragmatic trial with a nested qualitative study comparing traditional acupuncture with usual care in people who consult frequently with medically unexplained symptoms.1 2 Margaret McCartney has based her Observations article about it on several inaccuracies (quotations from her article in italics below).3(1) The “wellbeing score” was better in the control group than in the acupuncture group. This statement is untrue: an adjusted mean difference in favour of acupuncture was seen with wellbeing (wellbeing questionnaire, W-BQ12: 4.4 (1.6 to 7.2); P=0.002). This difference remained significant after missing values were imputed (3.4 (0.5 to 6.3); P=0.02).(2) The graphical …