Published in

International Union of Crystallography, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 1(60), p. 28-38, 2003

DOI: 10.1107/s0907444903020833

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

On the routine use of soft X-rays in macromolecular crystallography. Part II. Data-collection wavelength and scaling models

This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Published version: archiving allowed
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Complete and highly redundant data sets were collected at nine different wavelengths between 0.80 and 2.65 A on a xenon derivative of porcine pancreatic elastase in both air and helium atmospheres. The magnitude of the anomalous signal, as assessed by the xenon-peak height in the anomalous difference Patterson synthesis, is affected by the wavelength of data collection as well as by the scaling model used. For data collected at wavelengths longer than 1.7 A, the use of a three-dimensional scaling protocol is essential in order to obtain the highest possible anomalous signal. Based on the scaling protocols currently available, the optimal wavelength range for data collection appears to be between 2.1 and 2.4 A. Beyond that, any further increase in signal will be compensated for or even superseded by a concomitant increase in noise, which cannot be fully corrected for. Data collection in a helium atmosphere yields higher I/sigma(I) values, but not significantly better anomalous differences, than data collection in air.