Published in

Elsevier, Forensic Science International: Genetics, 1(8), p. 137-142

DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.08.015

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comparative performance between "next generation'' multiplex systems and the new European Standard Set of STR markers in the Portuguese Population

Journal article published in 2014 by Filipa Melo, António Amorim ORCID, Cíntia Alves
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Various multiplex STR systems have been developed by the major commercial companies in the forensic genetics field to comply with the recent establishment of the global European Standard Set (ESS) of markers. Of the various alternatives available, our laboratory decided to test the recent ESSplex Plus system (Qiagen) and the NGM kit (Life Technologies), which share the same 15 STR loci and comprise the most recently established ESS markers (D1S1656, D2S441, D10S1248, D12S391 and D22S1045). Apart from evaluating the kits' technical performances, a population and segregation study was carried out on a Portuguese sample, with the aim of introducing the ESS markers in routine forensic casework. A total of 370 individuals were sampled for this purpose, comprising 120 true trios (125 fathers, 125 mothers and 120 sons/daughters). No deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were detected for the five new loci in the Portuguese population and no genotyping inconsistencies were observed between kits. Parameters of forensic interest revealed that, of the five ESS markers, D1S1656 was the most informative in our sample. Comparison of performances between all autosomal multiplex systems available in our laboratory (ESSplex Plus, NGM, Identifiler Plus and Powerplex 16 HS), revealed that the multiplex kits with the ESS markers generally showed better performances and, among these, the ESSplex Plus kit showed slightly higher sensitivity and a better detection of degraded DNA information.