Published in

American Physiological Society, Journal of Applied Physiology, 2(95), p. 692-699, 2003

DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00358.2003

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Paradoxical absence of M lines and downregulation of creatine kinase in mouse extraocular muscle

This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The M lines are structural landmarks in striated muscles, necessary for sarcomeric stability and as anchoring sites for the M isoform of creatine kinase (CK-M). These structures, especially prominent in fast skeletal muscles, are missing in rodent extraocular muscle, a particularly fast and active muscle group. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that 1). myomesin and M protein (cytoskeletal components of the M lines) and CK-M are downregulated in mouse extraocular muscle compared with the leg muscles, gastrocnemius and soleus; and 2). the expression of other cytosolic and mitochondrial CK isoforms is correspondingly increased. As expected, mouse extraocular muscles expressed lower levels of myomesin, M protein, and CK-M mRNA than the leg muscles. Immunocytochemically, myomesin and M protein were not detected in the banding pattern typically seen in other skeletal muscles. Surprisingly, message abundance for the other known CK isoforms was also lower in the extraocular muscles. Moreover, total CK activity was significantly decreased compared with that in the leg muscles. Based on these data, we reject our second hypothesis and propose that other energy-buffering systems may be more important in the extraocular muscles. The downregulation of major structural and metabolic elements and relative overexpression of two adenylate kinase isoforms suggest that the extraocular muscle group copes with its functional requirements by using strategies not seen in typical skeletal muscles.