Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Wiley, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 8(10), p. 1715-1716, 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04795.x

Wiley, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 6(10), p. 1197-1198, 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04731.x

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Artificially depleted plasmas are not necessarily commutable with native patient plasmas for International Sensitivity Index calibration and International Normalized Ratio derivation: A rebuttal

Journal article published in 2012 by L. Poller, J. Jespersen, S. Ibrahim, A. Fattorini, L. Crippa, A. D'Angelo ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

we read with interest the letter by van den Besselar about ISI calibrant plasmas (1) and the ensuing exchange of correspondence with Poller et al. (2,3). We agree with the ECAA colleagues that with the FDA-approved ECAA set of artificially depleted plasmas and the PT/INR line inter-laboratory INR deviations are significantly reduced with all types of reagents, but we also suspect that, unless fresh native plasmas from patients on warfarin are used for calibration, this may not translate in better laboratory monitoring of patients on warfarin. © 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.