Published in

Taylor and Francis Group, Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, 3(24), p. 273-283

DOI: 10.1081/ias-120022937

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Improved sensitivity of colorimetric compared to chemiluminescence ELISAs for cytokine assays

Journal article published in 2003 by Javed Siddiqui, Daniel G. Remick ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Red circle
Preprint: archiving forbidden
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

Cytokines are often measured using ELISAs and chemiluminescence (CMIL) is reported to exhibit increased sensitivity compared to colorimetric (COL) assays. CMIL also has a wider dynamic detection range. We sought to directly compare ELISAs for measuring human TNF and IL-8 using CMIL or COL. CMIL substrates with glow fluorescence were obtained from 4 different commercial sources while the COL substrate was TMB. ELISAs for TNF and IL-8 were run under identical conditions and the standard curve extended from 0.5 to 4000 pg/ML. The COL substrate demonstrated a sigmoid shaped curve when plotted on a log-linear scale while the CMIL continued to increase up to the highest concentration. Both substrates were modeled most accurately by a 4 parameter equation with R values > 0.99. The standard curves for both the IL-8 and TNF demonstrated a lower limit of detection (LLD) for the COL comparable to the CMIL detection system. To precisely define the LLD quadruplicate blanks were run and the mean plus 4 standard deviations were used. By these criteria, the COL assay routinely had a LLD of < 1.5 pg/ML which was better than any of the CMIL substrates. Our data demonstrate the COL assays have the same or better sensitivity than CMIL and are significantly less expensive.