Published in

Nature Research, Nature, 7104(442), p. E9-E10, 2006

DOI: 10.1038/nature05139

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Nondisjunction, aneuploidy and tetraploidy

Journal article published in 2006 by Beth A. A. Weaver, Alain D. Silk, Don W. Cleveland ORCID
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.
This paper was not found in any repository, but could be made available legally by the author.

Full text: Unavailable

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

One simple, widely accepted mechanism for generating an aberrant chromosome number, or aneuploidy, is through nondisjunction--a chromosome distribution error that occurs during mitosis when both copies of a duplicated chromosome are deposited into one daughter cell and none into the other. Shi and King challenge this view, concluding that nondisjunction does not yield aneuploid cells directly, but instead gives rise to tetraploid cells that may subsequently become aneuploid through further division. Here we show that the direct result of chromosome nondisjunction is gain or loss of a single chromosome, which results in near-diploid aneuploidy, not tetraploidy. We suggest that chromatin trapped in the cytokinetic cleavage furrow is the more likely reason for furrow regression and tetraploidization.