Published in

Bentham Science Publishers, Current Pharmaceutical Design, 34(20), p. 5497-5505

DOI: 10.2174/1570161112666140123105536

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Is Time To Change To Halogenated Drugs In Cardiac Surgery, What Do We Have To Do With Propofol?

Journal article published in 2014 by Landoni Giovanni, Laura Pasin ORCID, Giovanni Borghi, Alberto Zangrillo
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

There is initial evidence, at least in cardiac surgery, that total intra-venous anesthesia (usually a propofol-based total intra-venous anesthesia) is associated with an increased mortality when compared to an anesthetic plan including an halogenated anesthetics. The cardiac protective properties of halogenated agents (desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane) have not been confirmed in non-cardiac surgery and mixed results exist for patients admitted in postoperative intensive care units. This article summarizes the papers with the most impressive findings in favor of halogenated anesthetics, but it recognizes that, at the same time, there is no evidence based medicine against the use of propofol, highlighting the need for large randomized trials that should focus on survival.