Published in

Elsevier, Marine and Petroleum Geology, (59), p. 676-678, 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.003

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Comment on Barckhausen et al., 2014 Evolution of the South China Sea: Revised ages for breakup and seafloor spreading

Journal article published in 2015 by Jih-Hsin Chang, Tung-Yi Lee, Ho-Han Hsu, Char-Shine Liu ORCID
This paper is available in a repository.
This paper is available in a repository.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Postprint: archiving restricted
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

We re-examined the cessation of the South China Sea seafloor spreading by using radioactive dating and fossil assemblage of the ETO, and the Te-derived age. The youngest available age for the fragment of the South China Sea is ~15 Ma and is more consistent with those suggested by previous studies. Moreover, recent IODP Expedition preliminary results suggested that the hemipelagic claystone layer strati- graphically bounded by igneous sequences of massive lava flow rock is Early Miocene in age. Therefore, the previous interpretations are more inclusive than those provided by Barckhasen et al. (2014) and indicate that a slow spreading ridge was more plausible to have occurred during the seafloor spreading of the South China Sea.