Published in

SAGE Publications, Acupuncture in Medicine, 3(27), p. 126-127, 2009

DOI: 10.1136/aim.2009.001313

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

The Acupuncture Trialists’ Collaboration: individual patient data meta-analysis of chronic pain trials

Journal article published in 2009 by Andrew J. Vickers ORCID, Alexandra C. Maschino
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Red circle
Published version: archiving forbidden
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

The Acupuncture Trialists’ Collaboration was established to synthesize data from high quality randomized trials on acupuncture for chronic pain. Trialists joining the collaboration provide raw data from their trial. Each data set is converted into a standardized format and then combined into a single data set for meta-analysis. The primary question addressed by the collaboration is the effect size of acupuncture in comparison to both sham acupuncture and to usual care control. A number of secondary analyses will be conducted, including evaluating variations in the effects of acupuncture by indication, acupuncture characteristics, and types of sham, as well as an assessment of the time course of acupuncture effects. Analyses will also be conducted to see if the type of acupuncture used, traditional Chinese or Western, affects outcome. At the time of writing, members of the Acupuncture Trialists’ Collaboration have conducted a total of 25 chronic pain trials including over 18,000 patients. We hope that our approach can serve as a model for future studies in acupuncture and other complementary therapies: we strongly believe that it is only by breaking down the oppositional culture of competing trialists, and sharing data in a robust scientific collaboration, that we can best translate clinical trial findings into patient benefit.