Dissemin is shutting down on January 1st, 2025

Published in

Society for Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, 13(35), p. 5373-5384, 2015

DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4198-14.2015

Links

Tools

Export citation

Search in Google Scholar

Temporal-Pattern Similarity Analysis Reveals the Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Context Reinstatement on Human Memory

Journal article published in 2015 by Tobias Staudigl ORCID, Christian Vollmar, Soheyl Noachtar, Simon Hanslmayr
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.
This paper is made freely available by the publisher.

Full text: Download

Green circle
Preprint: archiving allowed
Green circle
Postprint: archiving allowed
Orange circle
Published version: archiving restricted
Data provided by SHERPA/RoMEO

Abstract

A powerful force in human memory is the context in which memories are encoded (Tulving and Thomson, 1973). Several studies suggest that the reinstatement of neural encoding patterns is beneficial for memory retrieval (Manning et al., 2011; Staresina et al., 2012; Jafarpour et al., 2014). However, reinstatement of the original encoding context is not always helpful, for instance, when retrieving a memory in a different contextual situation (Smith and Vela, 2001). It is an open question whether such context-dependent memory effects can be captured by the reinstatement of neural patterns. We investigated this question by applying temporal and spatial pattern similarity analysis in MEG and intracranial EEG in a context-match paradigm. Items (words) were tagged by individual dynamic context stimuli (movies). The results show that beta oscillatory phase in visual regions and the parahippocampal cortex tracks the incidental reinstate-ment of individual context trajectories on a single-trial level. Crucially, memory benefitted from reinstatement when the encoding and retrieval contexts matched but suffered from reinstatement when the contexts did not match.